US
AGRICULTURAL exporters
have expressed dissatisfaction that mega shipping alliances do little to end
service reductions or reduce their costs, reports the American Journal of
Transportation.
Speaking
at the Agriculture Transportation Coalition (AGTC) Annual Meeting in
California, farmers said they were worried that new ocean carrier
alliances may be hurting service and costing shipper's money.
Panellists
included Elena Asher, Dairy Farmers of America (powdered milk and cheese);
Justin Cauley, CHS (grain and soybean); Blanca Palomino, Carriere Family Farms
(walnuts); Greg Jackson, Border Valley Trading (hay/forage) and Allison
Baker, JBS (beef, pork, poultry and hides).
Panellists
said consistency of ocean carrier service remains a problem and some blamed the
consolidation of carriers into larger vessel alliances.
They
complained that definitions of "free time" allowances before
demurrage charges are assessed by ocean carriers and fluctuates from port to
port.
Some
said export containers arrive at final Asian destinations late, because the
ocean carrier was late and missed the sailing time of the Asian transloading
vessel transporting the container to its final destination.
Others
said carrier alliances undermined carrier accountability, adding confusion when
an exporter books a container with one carrier, but discovers the container
sailed on another carrier's vessel belonging to the same carrier alliance,
resulting in late deliveries.
Some
complained of a lack of container availability. Import containers pay a higher
freight rate and so ocean carriers are more apt to provide containers to
importers than to exporters who pay lower freight rates.
One
panellist complained that a carrier announced a cancellation of delivering
containers at the last minute contributing to dislocations.
Source
: HKSG.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar