BLAMING megaship cargo
surges for port congestion is wrong because there are not enough them in the
Asia-Pacific today to make a difference, said an expert.
"Megaships
are not the major part of the problem, though vessel size may become a problem
in the coming years," said Andy Lane, a Singapore consultant,
who did a study of phenomenon.
Mr Lane told
the TPM
Asia Shipping Conference in Shenzhen that he found that out of 49,000
calls to 27 major Asian ports in 2014, only 12 per cent of vessels were above
10,000 TEU and that larger ships accounted for 22 per cent of total volume.
"Severe
peaks existed long before ships exceeded 10,000 TEU in capacity," said Mr
Lane, a partner with Singapore-based CTI Consult.
"While
this can create temporary congestion, it is the paradigms of weekly
manufacturing cycles and week closing that need to be challenged and
changed," he said.
Also, the
"sub-optimisation of terminal assets" was a more readily identifiable
culprit responsible for port congestion - a point taken by other speakers are
the conference that drew 600 delegates, said organisers.
Analysis of
IHS data on quay crane use at the world's 12 largest ports showed usage rates
averaging 48 per cent.
"If
these ports were to raise that to 60 per cent, it would increase average crane
usage from 28 to 32 moves per hour and provide 44 per cent extra
capacity," said Mr Lane.
"Given
cranes cost in the region of US$10 million each, this would result in a very
large increase in return on investment for that capital equipment, to a value
of more than $1 billion a year," he said.
End-of-week
peak in shipments and its ripple effects are another factor. Ships gather in
east and south China at the same time in order to meet weekend closing
schedules, he said.
Because ships
sail at similar speeds, they arrive in bunches and this spreads to feeder
ports, as well as onwards to US and European ports.
Source :
HKSG.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar