THE cheapest way to move goods into
the US from overseas will get more expensive as fuel prices rise and ocean
carriers aim to boost their earnings.
The Ports of Los Angeles and Long
Beach, despite all their congestion issues, are still the fastest and
cheapest ways to bring freight from Asia into the US. But the trans-Pacific
market has been anything but pacific, said Mark Szakonyi, executive editor of JOC.com,
creating an "erratic trans-Pacific shipping market" that was marked
by spot shipping rates rising as high as US$2,300 per FEU, reduced capacity
from the ocean carriers, severe port congestion and lower levels of service.
"The outlook (for ocean
freight) is framed by a new level of geopolitical and economic
uncertainty," Mr Szakonyi told an audience at Journal of Commerce's TPM 2019
conference in Long Beach.
"Beyond the tariff tensions,
there's also a slowing global economy and we have less cushion when there's
shocks to the system."
Trans-Pacific ocean shipping was one of bright spots for
the container ship industry last year. While overall container ship demand rose just under 4 per cent last year,
trans-Pacific shipping, specifically Asia-to-US grew 4.7 per cent said Uffe
Ostergaard, US president for Hapag-Lloyd, adding about one million TEU
to demand, reports New York's FreightWaves.
The second half of 2018 had the
biggest growth thanks to the tariff-related concerns of US importers. Mr
Ostergaard says the fourth quarter was marked by an extra 150,000 TEU of demand
just from tariff front-loading. Spot ocean freight rates nearly doubled between
June and November last year due to the increased demand.
"We certainly saw very robust
trade growth in 2018," Mr Ostergaard said. "That's real robust
growth."
He says the fundamentals are still
good for continued high demand into the US as unemployment remains low and the
strong US dollar makes imported goods cheaper.
Mr Ostergaard said those factors
support "a decent level of demand" in 2019 at just under 4 per cent.
The demand is coming up against
additional vessel capacity of 2.6 per cent expected next year, meaning a more
balanced market, Mr Ostergaard said. Indeed, the IMO 2020 fuel regulations
could further tip the balance in ocean carriers favour as more ships are taken
out of service, Mr Ostergaard said.
Citing research from ship industry
researchers, up to one per cent of the world container ship fleet could be out
of service during 2019 due to being fitted with sulfur scrubber or having their
fuel tanks cleaned ahead of filling up with low-sulfur fuel.
"Those are the things that we
see could have an impact on the supply and demand balance," Mr Ostergaard
said.
The switch to a more expensive,
low-sulfur fuel is bringing new challenges to ocean shipping in terms of how to
price annual customer contracts, said Philip Damas, director of maritime
consultancy Drewry. He says shippers with a couple of thousand
containers per year can expect to pay $1 million or so in higher costs due to
fuel surcharges from ocean carriers.
The risk of higher fuel prices,
along with the need to increase overall margins, means ocean carriers are
seeking rates up to 10 per cent or higher for 2019.
The low-sulfur fuel mandate
"will be the biggest operational risk for carriers in 2020", Mr Damas
said. "The first round of bids from providers show double-digit price
increases from previous levels."
Not that there are no options for
shippers. Ocean carriers are starting to look at using floating rates as
opposed to fixed rates for shipping. But the changes to variable costs for the
ocean carriers means that many are "no longer willing to sign contracts
with fixed all-in rates", Mr Damas said.
Source : HKSG / Photo : IHS Fairplay.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar