TALKS have collapsed between
the US east coast International Longshoremen's Association (ILA) and their
employers of the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX), sparking fears of a
mass cargo diversion to west coast ports ahead of a legal strike date of
September 31 when the contract expires.
Protested USMX negotiator
James Capo: "The ILA's posture is contrary to the history of cooperation
that has characterised these negotiations in the past and, since 1977, has led
to agreements without any disruption to the supply chain and port operations on
the east and Gulf coasts."
ILA spokesman James McNamara
raised the possibility of a strike for the first time since talks began in
March, reported the Charleston's Post and Courier.
Mr McNamara said the union
would likely ask the USMX to present their full contract proposal, rather than
continuing with committee meetings. "If we review it and reject it, and
September 30 arrives, then we are likely looking at a strike," he said.
Mr Capo said employers
wanted to address "archaic practices", among them, the
"low-show" jobs that pay some ILA members for 24 hours of work even
if they are only on the job for a few hours a day.
ILA president Harold Daggett
has argued that some on are on-call 24 hours a day, referring to a shop steward
who was paid US$400,000 a year, a figure he did not dispute when questioned,
only saying the shop steward was a member of a "very good union".
In recent days, fears have
been expressed in the Port of Savannah over the possibility of a strike despite
frequent reports of goodwill from both sides.
Sources told the Hong Kong
Shipping Gazette in Savannah that the ILA is sticking by its demand to have men
paid to do no work or hired to work on shifts for which they would not turn up.
Employers are said to be
resisting union featherbedding to guarantee pay for ILA men who do not work
because of enlarged work gangs unrelated to cargo-handling needs, a development
which is also the result of union demands.
Source : HKSG.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar