FIVE judges
of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague unanimously ruled that China
had violated Philippines' rights by building
artificial islands that destroyed coral reefs and disrupted fishing and oil
exploration in the South China Seas, which it claims is its own territory.
The
court ruled "there was no evidence that China had historically exercised
exclusive control" over the area and so had no right to claim
historic rights to resources "falling within the 'nine-dash line'."
But
China, which boycotted the entire proceedings, reiterated that it does not
accept the court's jurisdiction, reported The Associated Press.
China's
claims, which include waters approaching neighbouring countries, are based on a
vaguely defined "nine-dash-line" found on a 1940s Chinese map, notes Agence
France-Presse.
The
row has involved the United States, which has deployed warships to assert
freedom of navigation in the waters - through which one-third of the global oil
trade passes.
China
says its fishermen have visited the area for centuries, but the court said that
under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which China
signed, Beijing had no exclusive control of it.
Any
historic rights were "extinguished" when it signed up to UNCLOS, it
said, and there was "no legal basis for China to claim historic rights to
resources within the sea areas falling within the 'nine-dash line'," it
said.
Crucially,
it ruled that none of the Spratlys, a chain of outcrops in the south of the
sea, were "islands" under the meaning of UNCLOS, and thus whoever had
sovereignty over them - an issue it did not address - was not entitled to 200-nautical-mile
exclusive economic zones (EEZs) of their own.
Some
sea areas were therefore definitely in the Philippines' EEZ, it said, as they
were "not overlapped by any possible entitlement of China".
China
had violated the Philippines' sovereign rights in its EEZ and the artificial
islands Beijing has been furiously building in recent years - reshaping the
area in an effort to bolster its claim - have inflicted severe environmental
damage, it added.
But
China "solemnly declares that the award is null and void and has no
binding force. China neither accepts nor recognises it," said a statement
from the foreign ministry.
The
US
State Department called on both parties to comply with their
obligations, according to a statement from spokesman John Kirby.
US Defence
Secretary Ash Carter
said the ruling is an opportunity for all to act in accordance with the rule of
law.
The
United States has not taken sides in the South China Sea disputes but has
worked to ensure freedom of navigation and overflight in the region are
maintained, which denies Chinese rights to sovereignty.
"The
Philippines strongly affirms its respect for this milestone decision as an
important contribution to ongoing efforts in addressing disputes in the South
China Sea," said Philippine Foreign Secretary Perfecto Yasay.
The
court also found that China had interfered with Philippine petroleum
exploration at Reed Bank, tried to stop fishing by Philippine vessels within
the country's exclusive economic zone and failed to prevent Chinese fishermen
from fishing within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone at Mischief
Reef and Second Thomas Shoal.
Japan's
Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida said the tribunal's decision is "final and legally
binding" and that the two sides should comply.
Mr
Kishida said in a statement that "Japan strongly expects that the parties'
compliance with this award will eventually lead to the peaceful settlement of
disputes in the South China Sea."
China
considers bilateral talks with the other claimants the only way to address the
South China Sea disputes.
Vietnam
welcomed the ruling in the Philippines' case, but accused Chinese vessels of
sinking a Vietnamese fishing boat in disputed waters.
Chinese
vessels chased and sank the Vietnamese boat around midday Saturday as it was
fishing near the Paracel islands. Another trawler rescued the five fishermen
seven hours later.
Source
: HKSG.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar