BRITISH Shipping
Minister Robert Goodwill
all but condemned the US Jones Act as "blatant protectionism"
when told his mirthful audience at London's International Shipping Week
that "my official position has to be very careful not to describe the
Jones Act as a blatant piece of protectionism".
In blasting
regional restrictive legislation, Mr Goodwill argued: "Shipping works best
when it is allowed to work on its own terms, and when it prospers, it adds to
the wealth of nations.
"Consider
the sophistication of the modern shipping trade, with its complex supply chains
and just-in-time logistics. The endless movements of millions of containers
around the world. No government could design such a system, let alone manage it
or improve it," Mr Goodwill said.
"The way
to protect your shipbuilding industry is to produce the best ships in the world
and sell them round the world, as the Koreans and Chinese have been showing us.
We demonstrated here in the UK in the ?0s and ?0s what happens if you don't
build the best ships in the world," he said.
But US
Maritime Administration (MARAD) chief Paul Jaenichen defended the Jones
Act, reported Seatrade Maritime News.
"Every
presidential administration for the last 90 years has supported the Jones Act
and there's a reason for that. We have to have a US merchant marine, and the
Jones Act is one way to maintain that, but also make sure that we continue to
have an indigenous shipbuilding capacity and commercial base that supports not
only commercial shipbuilding but also naval ships," Mr Jaenichen said.
Euronav CEO Paddy
Rodgers said that
public listing would be one way shipping companies could garner more
understanding in governments. "At the moment we're not invested with any
particular countries, so it's very easy for shipping to become a whipping
boy," he said.
"When
environmental legislation is introduced, you have to look at who benefits from
that legislation. When a reduction in China's coal usage was announced, oil
majors were rubbing their hands together.
Said Wah
Kwong Maritime Holdings chairwoman Sabrina Chao: "We're all for
environmental changes, but they need to take place in a level playing field.
There's a disconnect between legislation and technology. For example the
ballast water treatment ? it's unclear for shipowners operating in a very
complicated environment. There needs to be a level playing field."
Source :
HKSG.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar