DATA from
London's Drewry Shipping Consultants shows that, while bigger box ships
enjoy a cost advantage, falling fuel prices have halved the slot cost benefit
for mega-ships, notes Vancouver's Ship & Bunker.
"Carriers
are fearful of being left behind in the race for ULCVs (ultra large container
vessels), but while they will retain a diminishing competitive advantage, the
value of having a smaller, but more flexible fleet in a slowing market should
not be overlooked," said Drewry.
Drewry says
an 18,000 TEU vessel on a round-trip Asia-North Europe route yielded a US$38
per slot cost savings compared to a 14,000-TEU vessel, down from $76 per slot
at its June 2014 peak.
Due to their
size ULCV's can only operate on the Asia-Europe trades, and while they have
been joined by the 10,000 TEU and above newbuilds, Drewry says "it's where
carriers are putting the 8,000-10,000 TEU that reveals how they are trying to
spread the burden of the new capacity."
Those smaller
newbuilds delivered in 2015 have been deployed in nine different trade lanes,
and Drewry points to the Asia to east coast South America route as an example
of how that can then push down spot rates.
"It is a
delicate balancing act, and one that carriers cannot win all of the time,"
said Drewry, before suggesting that the situation will only get worse as there
are many more mega-ships on the way.
"The
alarming drop in Asia to Europe traffic and a parallel crash in rates caused
two of the big carriers groups to take the unprecedented decision to suspend
services in the supposed peak season, while the two other alliances have been
tinkering with missed sailings to support higher rate requests," said
Drewry.
"The
rush to purchase ULCVs is borne of the desire to reduce slot costs and not be
left behind, but the impact on the wider industry in terms of heavily
discounted freight rates has thus far been entirely predictable," said
Drewry.
Source : HKSG.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar